Apologetics, why aren't all Christians engaging in it?

"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
-Albert Einstein

Well said my friend. What I want to stress most is that "Religion without science is blind." This is indeed true. Although many Christians believe that there is no science involved in Christianity, they are all WRONG!!! Science means knowledge. Nothing more nothing less. Therefore, it is stupid to say that Religion is only by Faith. Yes, Faith plays a role in being a Christian, but not 100% of it. Faith in God and his word plays the role for the parts that science can't explain, such as predestination and morals. However science can reveal to us a great deal about God. Not his motives and such, but events in time. Such as the following:

1. The Big Bang Theory (BBT)- Contrary to popular belief, the Big Bang is not in the least bit Atheistic. It does not disprove God, but in fact proves him. First let some parameters be set: The Big Bang is an event called the start of the universe, nothing more nothing less, and that means Darwinian evolution is not included. Now you may ask, "how does the BBT prove God!?!?" Well, here you go... Because the Universe is undoubtedly expanding, we can assume that there was a "bang" if we rewind (were the universe would be contracting until its starting point. There you go. As easy as that, but how does it prove God? Well, the Principles of Causality state that any finite object, within space and time, must have a cause. And so, the universe must have a cause (God) because it is finite. Now some may argue the the universe is infinite, but infinity is only a concept and cannot be physical (like the universe).
2. Darwinian Evolution/Origin of Life- Science and fossil records both go against Evolution. Haeckel's Embryos were faked, as he used the same (but edited slightly) molds and such for his pictures. The "early" stage of the embryos is really near the middle of the embryonic stage. It is like an hour glass, the narrow center part being the time that the embryos look similar. The Miller-Urey experiment, in which he supposedly recreated the first life-form was false. What he used for his experiment were not at all what is proposed today to be the type of atmosphere back when the first life-form existed. And the proposed environment doesn't produce a life-form, but rather toxins.

Yep, that's what I have for now... I just felt compelled to spread some information to my friends. And I hope you use it to defend your faith. Here is a good website on Apologetics:

Answers in Genesis